This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Politics & Government

Are Photo IDs Necessary at the Polls?

Republicans say the new law will prevent voter fraud; Democrats say the new law could disenfranchise thousands of registered voters. What do you think?

Earlier this week, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives passed and Gov. Tom Corbett signed into law a controversial new measure that will require voters to show a photo identification card at polling places beginning with the general election in November.

Many are decrying the new legislation as a threat to disenfranchise as many as 11 percent of eligible voters who do not possess a government photo ID card, many of whom are senior citizens.

"This legislation ignores the tremendous inconvenience it will create for seniors who don't have a driver's license,” said Easton-based state , D-136.

Find out what's happening in Eastonwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

“With limited or no public transportation to suburban PennDOT photo centers, this proposal puts a tremendous barrier in the way of seniors legitimately registered to vote as they seek to cast their ballot."

Easton City Councilman Mike Fleck spoke out against the law at a meeting last week.

Find out what's happening in Eastonwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Fleck said the law is likely to hurt seniors and the poor, because many people in those two groups lack a photo ID, as well as the resources to easily get one. 

"I think the whole process is disturbing, and it's likely to affect us here because we have some of the poorest of the poor," he said. 

He added that it will be especially uncomfortable if poll workers have to turn people away due to a lack of ID because many of them are friends and neighbors, some of them with lifelong relationships, with the electorate they serve.

Among others who oppose the law are the League of Women Voters, AARP and the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania, which says that the law will place undue stress on those who supervise elections at the voting booth.

"This bill is unnecessary and a real threat to disenfranchise voters," said Freeman during the bill's debate in the House chamber. "If you look at the cases of voter fraud, there have only been four voters convicted since 2004. As the Philadelphia Inquirer so aptly put it, this is a 'fix in search of a problem.'"

Republicans who back the legislation say the law is aimed at preventing voter fraud. But, as Freeman points out, there is little to support any claim that voter fraud is rampant in the Commonwealth.

Some Democrats say it is merely a thinly veiled effort to suppress votes from traditional Democratic constituencies – such as the elderly, the disabled, minorities and youth  – in time for the 2012 Presidential election.

What do you think? Vote in our poll and tell us more in the comments.

-- Freelance reporter Christina Georgiou contributed to this story.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?