The media, political pundits and the general public are still analyzing and discussing the implications of last week’s .
While entertaining, at times, I’m still not convinced that the American public received an honest depiction of what the Republican Party plans are for our families as we move ahead.
Being a Democrat, and a moderate one, I guess it shouldn’t come as a surprise that there wasn’t much I agreed with in terms of the RNC’s content during their convention.
Aside from the speeches and messaging, what I found most troubling was the debt clock that continuously ran inside the arena. The mere placement of that clock seemed to be the most dishonest aspect of the entire convention.
The Chairman of the Republican National Committee, Reince Priebus, was quoted saying, “this clock reminds every delegate and every American why we are here in Tampa - because America can and must do better.” The implication was that President Obama was solely responsible for our nation’s debt.
We all know this is very untrue. There is certainly a lot of blame to pass around, and rightly so. Leaders in both of our two major political parties have contributed to our massive debt.
However, while watching the GOP’s vice presidential nominee Congressman Paul Ryan’s speech, I could not help to ponder about the sheer irony while that clock continued to wrack up some hefty and unfortunate numbers.
Wasn’t it Congressman Ryan and his Republican counterparts in Congress who pushed for, and voted in favor of, the Bush tax cuts over the past decade? Didn’t Mr. Ryan support war spending in Iraq (a needless war) and Afghanistan? The answer to both questions is, yes.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has told us that these tax cuts and war spending were the biggest policy drivers of the debt we incurred over the past decade. These policies had the most damaging effect on our overall economy. These are facts that cannot be denied.
While a pipedream, I wish Mr. Ryan simply looked up and pointed at the clock during his passionate speech to say, “you know what, let’s be honest. My GOP friends and colleagues in Congress helped to add a great majority of this debt to our country. I take responsibility for my part, and now we want to reverse course and do something about it.”
Of course, that didn’t happen. I would imagine doing so would have been a difficult thing to do given the venue and circumstances surrounding Congressman Ryan. But it certainly would have indicated real leadership. Mr. Ryan could have picked up that mantle and done better, as Mr. Priebus previously noted, by taking responsibility for his record.
The catchy slogan of the RNC Convention was - We Built It. As far as the numbers read on the debt clock prop, yes you did.
Every time we vote for someone we are only voting for the lesser of two or more evils. Mr Perfect never shows up on the ballot and too often Mr. Corruptible does.
Don't you feel that the debt during Bush and Obama has a lot to do with: 1) Bush tax cuts which were supposed to be temporary but continue to extend on 2) The invasion, destruction, and rebuilding of Iraq (still spending money there today) 3) The coninued Afghanistan intervention 4) The unaffordable Bush presecription drug plan - still being paid for today 5) An unwillingness to have miltary spending cuts on the table - huge spending there. This is not all Bush but a lot of it is the Republican agenda: Bush, Toomey, Cantor etc. Anytime Obama tries to undo some of this damage the GOP goes crazy. Nothing will pass the House. I have no trouble believing Dems contrinute to the debt. I'm just amazed Repubs. will not take responsibility and claim fiscal responsibility. And this is true no matter who is or was President.
1)They are the Bush/Obama tax cuts - he signed up 2010 http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20026069-503544.html I don't believe taking money out of the private sector will improve the economy. Sure gov't could spend it and there would be some economic "activity" - but no meaningful sustained job or wealth creation. Do you believe the economy crashed because the tax rates weren't high enough? 2)Seemed like a good idea at the time - now, not so much. 3)Going after Taliban/Al Qaeda good, nation building = fail 4) I wrote about this here (halfway in): http://tinyurl.com/cykvcdx 5) The military has more constitutional justification than most of the other nonsense the gov't is involved in. Rational measured cuts and leaving the countries we are not welcome in is something I would like to see. You fail to mention something that is a major chunk (36%) of federal expenditure and poised to take the whole budget down: http://www.ssa.gov/oact/TRSUM/index.html
We all agree the debt is too high and unsustainable. We do not pay for tax cuts...the government simply collects less of our money. We then have more to spend in the free market where jobs are created and the government purse swells with more income tax revenue from the stronger private sector growth...again from people keeping more of their own money. Spending is the problem. Entitlements are the problem. Cuts to "military" spending need to be better defined as cuts to "non-defense" related military spending. Obama "PROMISED" to cut the deficit in HALF by the end of his 1st term. FAIL. All he did was add ridiculous amounts of spending. There were those of us in the republican party NOT happy with Bush's spending either at the time. You'll find most of us in the Tea Party...along with democrats who are also tired of both parties spending us out of existence. The numbers are scary enough, but they distract from the real threat Obama poses; the loss of liberty through his Panto like use of the Executive Order over the legislative process set forth in the Constitution. We have 2 choices; Obama has not come close to honoring his promises, and Romney at least has solid business experience which even Bill Clinton approves of. The choice for some may not be crystal clear, but it certainly seems like we'd be shooting ourselves in the foot by re-electing Obama.
If you were so patriotic, you would pay taxes on your gross income and interest....and not take any of these deductions.......but you don't. You avoid paying taxes..... like anyone else does when they follow the IRS rules. I suggest you practice what you preach !
WOW, you covered almost all the talking points except you forgot that we're racist too. Aside from that, the DNC should award you their top prize...a life-time supply of cool-aid. Facts are a stubborn thing. But in this case, blind followers are even more stubborn. Post your name and stop hiding behind rhetoric monickers and fact-less arguments. Include actual CBO numbers to back up your charges and we can then have a real conversation. But thanks anyway for the laughs.