Easton Could Extend Parking Enforcement Times
You could soon have to feed Easton's meters from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., and pay to park on Sunday.
The days of finding free parking in downtown Easton after 6 p.m. -- as well as not paying to park at all on Sundays -- could soon be over.
City Council is considering changes to Easton's parking, including higher prices and new meter enforcement hours that run from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday to Saturday.
"There shouldn’t be any reason we shouldn’t go to 9," Councilman Roger Ruggles said at Tuesday night's council budget hearing. "It’s easier to remember. It’s 9 to 9."
The plan would also require visitors to downtown Easton to pay to park on Sundays between noon and 9 p.m.
Another proposed change: All downtown parking meters would go from 50 cents to $1 per hour. That rate is standard in many of the communities surveyed by Police Lt. Matthew Lohenitz, who runs the department's traffic division.
"Easton’s rate is considerably lower," Lohenitz told council. "We would be right in line with State College to Pittsburgh to all points in between."
Councilman Jeff Warren said he worried the increase would be too much of a "shock" for downtown business owners.
"Going from 50 cents to a dollar, that’s a pretty significant jump," he said.
Lohenitz noted that the city's new credit/debit card meters still take quarters, allowing people to park for 15-minute intervals. He said it's also possible to configure those meters to take nickels and dimes as well, so "you can customize your stay."
The city is hoping the new rates and longer enforcement hours will raise about $190,000. That money will fund the Greater Easton Development Partnership, which oversees the Easton Main Street Initiative, the Ambassadors program and the Easton Farmers' Market.
City council is hoping to hear from residents on the proposed parking changes at its meeting tonight. The meeting is due to start at 6 p.m. in council chambers on the sixth floor of City Hall.
Bob Rabinsky
8:03 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
The city has now officially gone out of it's mind. We need the extra money to pay for what? The ambassadors. My god what a waste of money. Remember the city does own mini sweepers for the side walks. Where are they? For the money it costs for the ambassadores we can buy five truck loads of brooms to hand out to property owners. Do people realize part of the ambassadores cost is sent out of state to the company who runs the program in various citys? Keep the money here. Is this just the city's ego? Just wate untill the store owners start complaining there business is being hurt because customers will no longer come to easton
Ronnie DelBacco
8:24 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
I have to agree with Bob. We need to entice people to come to Easton and spend their money in our stores and restaurants, not on parking meters and parking fines. All the "beautification" being done will mean nothing if people can't afford to visit Easton.
It won't be long before the snowplows tear up the new sidewalks that jet out into the streets now too. Not the plow drivers' fault, but it's gonna happen. Then we'll spend more money for repairs. Of course if you ask Mayor Panto where the funds are coming from he'll talk about "grant money" from the state, ignoring the fact that even that money is available because of taxation. Yet he'll refuse to call it "tax dollars". Either way, we're paying for it all.
With extended meter rules and Sunday fees I predict much more business for 25th Street stores and restaurants instead of the down town merchants.
But I'm sure the arts community will be enough of a draw to satisfy Easton's obsession with fluff spending.
Amend Wun
8:22 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
The ambassadors are a good program that has positive ROI. They do more than sweep the streets. A huge part of their job is hospitality. You can hand out all the brooms you want, most won't use them because they think it's the city's job to keep the streets clean. Take it from someone who does sweep. This is just the wrong mechanism thru which to pay for it. Further, the majority of the increase seems to go to just pay for the new equipment. What's the point if it ends up deterring people from coming downtown. As a downtown merchant, I can't really take a decrease in my customer base. It's also a slap in the face that my customers, who do pay, will be subsidizing the businesses across the street who's customers routinely do not pay. The community wants to encourage redevelopment, but this strategy seems short-sighted towards that endeavor. If all we keep doing is fleecing our visitors, we'll become less inviting. Rebuilding a community costs money. The citizens of Easton need to come to realize that and stop looking for ways to get other people to pay for it.
Amend Wun
8:46 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
@Ronnie- there are plenty of other communities that use sidewalk bumpouts as a way of increasing pedestrian safety without having issues with plowing. That's just a canard. And if the the plow drivers can't navigate around them, then they shouldn't hold that job. Further, you're convaluting the issues with the construction on south third. It was the last part of a larger utility upgrade project for that section of town. And denigrating the Easton arts community is ridiculous. They're pulling their weight. The same can't be said for some of the owner's of vacant property, like Mr. Kasis or the Rock Church. An informed person would realize that instead of blindly throwing rocks.
Bob Rabinsky
9:20 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Amend you are right it is fleecing our visitors but it is also fleecing our neighbors who live downtown. When I moved here if I left for work at 7 and came home at 5pm I did not have to worry about meeters. Now I have to buy a parking sticker for $100. Every one who has a car and lives downtown has to buy a sticker. All the people who live on southside are lucky. It stinks when a resident cant even park in front of his own house. Every one who owns a home downtown should get one spot free. We pay taxes. But no thats thousands of $ for the city
Ronnie DelBacco
10:56 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Amend,
Perhaps you're right about the plow drivers skill. My point was about the wasted money on beatification. Using the "tail end of a utility project" to buffer the extra beautification spending is also a canard. As for denigrating the arts community, I wasn't. My point was that it is real businesses, like yours, that bring in revenue for the city. If they focus 1/2 as much on the businesses as they do on the arts community down town you might be better off. No disrespect intended to the arts community.
I agree with you about the vacant and unimproved properties. Business has left Easton in droves. I remember going to Farr's Shoe Store, Orr's, Joseph's, The Surprise Store, and waiting in line downstairs in the Sears Catalog order line in one of those stores on Third St. as a kid. I even remember the bathrooms in the circle. Easton was once full of shops and people, buildings were kept up better, police patrolled on foot, and it felt much safer than it does now.
Until things improve in Easton there's always Walmart for just about everything one could need, PLUS free parking all the time, not just 9 to 9. (Mr. Ruggles)
Ray Thierrin
10:34 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Wrong way to go guys...raising the rates will only cause visitors to make different decisions away from the downtown. As a business owner that has a LOT of customers that are downtown for short duration of time, and many up to 8 or 9 at night, this will potentially have an adverse impact.
michael
11:46 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Easier to remember meter times 9 am to 9 pm ? Much easier to forget you don't have to feed the meter after 6 pm while you spend your money downtown , totally disagree with this as for the curbing on 3rd street already noticing broken curbing , just a matter of time till a plow destroys it , it a circle curb much harder to plow around
michael
11:48 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
I do love that area , city did a great job welcoming visitors to our city , also bottom of college hill area looks great too !!!
Oli Landwijt
12:52 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Why not just create an artificial moat around downtown and charge $20 to enter?
Bob Rabinsky
10:32 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Oli I'll pay $20. to get out