So, it is fair to saddle the citizens of Easton with all the county social services, including the prison, but it isn't fair to tax commuters due to the current economic climate? Hasn't this economy also affected the citizens of Easton? I'm not saying I'm in favor of this proposed tax, but the language in the county's resolution smacks of bias. Has it occured to the county that Easton might not need as many police, and thus the need to pay the residual pensions, were it not for the prison; a prison with a 60-70% recidivism rate? And what about the townships not seeing a need to financially support Safe Harbor since they don't have homeless in their community? Easton should receive an impact fee(s) for such things, much like Bethlehem did when the casino opened. Instead, the county gives out tax "perks" to develop farm land while the citizens of Easton are left to figure it out on their own. Aren't we still the county seat? Where's the county's pride in that? Bias, I say.

Well said, Amen. Someone ought to clue in the county that they have no say in this tax. It's up to the city of Easton which will remember the county's thoughtless expansion and increase of prison space without one dime of payment coming to the city. Should we forget that the county is paying $50 per prisoner to West Easton Borough. Where's Easton's share? We have to maintain a police force to back up the county prison and the county court system. A prison escapee is a threat to what community? Certainly not Plainfield Township. We deserve even more than this tax payment. The county has done little to benefit its host community. Instead of crying about this tax, the county should be trying to find ways to help Easton. If this is unfair, ask Harrisburg to correct the law. Easton is only following the remedies that the legislature provided. Next, we will hear the usual threats of the county seat relocating elsewhere. Just make sure that you take the prison with you!

One more, I do not favor this tax either. The city regretfully has to use the options provided municipalities by state law. According to the mayor, Easton can only use these funds for pension costs. If the mayor is right then the article's statement that the tax is needed to pay for pension and legal expenses is, perhaps, wrong and misleading.

You're correct, APOV. I've changed the story.

gee county council sees the need to put its nose where it does not belong ... butt out council its eastons problem ill butt in with my opinion... freeze the pension plan let a federal agency take control and begin anew with a 401k

i like mayor panto's remark i to believe if the county does not like the tax move out i am sure lafayette college will make good use of the countys buildings