Animal Shelter: Towns Must Pay More
The Center for Animal Health and Welfare says it can't afford to be an 'open' shelter.
Starting next year, it could cost more for municipalities to drop off stray animals at the Center for Animal Health and Welfare.
Citing "spiraling costs" and a rise in the number of animals coming to its Williams Township shelter, the center will now charge municipalities $150 per dropoff, and will only take animals if there is room.
The center said it has been nearly at capacity in the past year, and often has had to turn animals away from communities that have contracts with it.
"Furthermore, certain municipalities have actively or negligently sought loopholes to utilize our services without paying for them," the shelter wrote in its newsletter. "Ultimately, the Center was left with choosing between providing charity to animals or providing charity to municipalities. Given our core mission, we have chosen to focus on the animals."
William Clements, a board member at the shelter, declined to say much about the loopholes, "because I don't want to advertise the creative ways that these municipalities have found to cheat the system."
But he did say one community's police officers caught a stray dog and then had a citizen drive the dog to the center.
"There were other schemes, but that's one that I don't think many municipalities will want to mimic, as the liability involved was staggering, in my opinion," Clements wrote in an e-mail to Patch. "I believe that someone in that municipality finally recognized that issue as well, and that particular dodge hasn't been repeated for at least 6 months."
Clement added that the shelter wants to work with municipalities rather than battle with them.
The shelter says it wants to set up the type of arrangements it has with the city of Easton in other communities, and continue its trap/neuter/release program.
Dawn Johnston
8:55 am on Saturday, November 10, 2012
There should be a law that a person purchasing/adopting a dog should pay for a screening background check. To many animals are abused and left to fend for themselves because the owner has the idea then pet will just care for itself.They are kids in furry coats .need food ,water shelter and most of all love. If a law has been broken the person should not be allowed to own a dog or any living creature.
Amend Wun
11:55 pm on Saturday, November 10, 2012
Just as a point of clarity, the vast majority of the animals that the shelter houses are cats; some 400 cats to about 80 or so dogs, at least it was close to that ratio the last time I asked.
Blackdemon
8:34 am on Sunday, November 11, 2012
I had an officer tell me that they don't want to take any feral cats, so do what I had to do. If the shelter would do what they had to do. They wouldn't have so many cats. When I was a teen, and we had too many cats on the farm in Jersey we did what we had to do. If we didn't they would get illnesses, and die slow and painfully. My grandfather would tell us boys that after the morning work, we were to go cat hunting with the 22 in the milk house. If we did that now, some bleeding heart liberal would have a fit. Just saying.
Amend Wun
8:43 am on Sunday, November 11, 2012
Blaming the shelter for not wholesale euthanasia of cats is ass backwards, and taking pride in shooting strays isn't commendable either. There's a new program of catch, fix, ear notch and release back where the cat was originally found. This slows the population growth of feral cats and allows for the reduction of vermin within the city limits.